Drinking, Smoking, Alzheimers, Facebook, Psystar


Hear the Radiocast

Drinking, Smoking, Alzheimer’s -

Facebook Privacy issue with Blockbuster

Feature:
What’s the big deal with Psystar?

Last week PsyStar, a company out of Florida, offered a machine in where you can have any Operating system installed. That included Mac OSX Leopard. The company has only been doing this for 5 days and already they have seen a flux of press. Why is this so controversial and is the company offering a service they cannot fulfill?

If you live in a Windows world, you don’t think much about what PC Windows is installed on. You may have a Dell, HP, Gateway, Lenovo or even built your system out of spare parts from the Six Million Dollar Man. However, Apple users had no choice when it comes to the hardware. If you bought Apple, you bought Apple. Hardware and software was created by the same company.

The idea is simple - if you don’t introduce a foreign motherboard design into the mix, you don’t have to compensate for it. Apple controls their hardware so they should know their products well. Now keep in mind there are other companies that make products for Apple - but nobody ever made a consumer personal computer that could run the Apple Operating system when it was using the PowerPC chip.

However, about 2 years ago Apple made a major change by moving from the PowerPC chip to a processor made by Intel. The reasons why were simple: power and heat. The PowerPC chips ran hotter and took more juice to run.

Because of the switch, Apple had to adjust the software to accommodate. Since the Intel chip for a Mac was no different than the one for a PC, Apple was able to tout the option you could install Windows XP or Vista on a Mac. So that meant that people could install Mac on a PC?

Not exactly. There is still one difference between the two machines. While PC’s use a Basic Input Output System (aka BIOS), Mac’s uses the Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI). Basically, this is what tells the computer what a Hard drive, keyboard, mouse, CD ROM and other components are and how to access them.

EFI has been touted to be superior over BIOS - simply because BIOS is an older technology and still runs on old ideals. BIOS runs on 16 bit technology whereas EFI was an adjustable system that supports 64 bit systems. Therefore, machines are able to support PC environments because it could emulate a BIOS environment.

The reverse can also be done - but you have to remember, old technology emulating new technology usually is not going to work as well as the opposite. Still, it can be done, and it has.

When Apple updated their Operating System to Leopard, it included a lot more instructions to work better in an Intel environment. Instructions that others can use to build the OS on a PC. Hackintosh has been a term for those who take the challenge to install Leopard on a standard Intel PC.

Up until now, if you wanted a Hackintosh, you had to build it yourself. Psystar is the first to publicly claim they can build you a Hackintosh. And because of this, they have been under a lot of direct fire. Can they really sell Leopard on their machines?

There is one thing people have been mentioning left and right. That is Apple’s End User License Agreement (EULA) says that the Apple Operating System can only be installed on Apple hardware. Psystar is not Apple Hardware, therefore it’s violating the EULA.

Since it’s convergence on the scene, Psystar has been under some great scrutiny. However, what is funny is that the company is not getting stopped by Apple. They have gotten stopped by their Payment Processing company - basically they can’t process credit cards.

So the real question is “Does it violate Apple’s Licensing”. Well that’s something a judge needs to decide. But the machine is still viable for a Windows or Linux PC.

I really think Apple should allow Psystar to continue making a Mac clone. They don’t need to accept all Mac clones, but one or two might be what makes Mac a more predominate machine in this environment. Mac has less than 8 percent of Market Share. Maybe a clone or two could boost that in the next 2-3 years? If Mac gets 25-30 percent market share, it will definitely take a big chunk out of the PC market for a great computing alternative.

IN the meantime, Psystar has a huge battle just so they can get their computers out the door. Eventually they will - with or without Leopard. At any rate, Psystar has gotten a lot of talk lately and that means it’s pretty much become mainstream overnight. Gotta love marketing strategy.

Related Articles

This entry was posted on Sunday, April 20th, 2008 and is filed under Vocalo.org. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Contact Geekazine - 608-205-4378
Open 24-7!
608-205-4378
geekazine
@gmail.com

Blockbuster Deal

Get 25% off when you mention Geekazine, or simply select this ad

Apple Online Store
Accessory Geeks 125x125

Polls

Do you think Google should buy Digg?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Categories

Blogroll

Other Great Podcasts

Website

Comcast is Watching You. Good or Bad?

Comcast is Watching You. Good or Bad?

The New York Times reports of a Blogger who gets an email after complaining about a service that is not there. Other people have complained about their bills and Comcast comes back with a “Can I Help”? Even others find themselves with internet connection issues for trying to use the service. This begs the question: are we seeing a new trend and is this a good or bad thing?

First of all, most likely they are not looking at your blog or twitter directly. They are most likely running searches from Google, Summize (remember - Twitter bought that company) and a bunch of other engines. They look at keywords that - in turn - give them information to turn around and say “What can we do?”

Last year while working at a job, we decided to implement a helpdesk system. I looked over a few systems, gave a recommendation and we implemented. The one I’m going to talk about wasn’t the one we went with simply because there were good features they lacked, but this is one feature that really made me think about the way we can see customers.

The service let you put a piece of code on each users’ desktop. When they logged into the network, that code would send a log to the helpdesk software. If any keywords showed up, the software would alert the helpdesk so action could be taken before the customer could call in.

Think about it: Google a specific topic. Let’s take Comcast for example. Go to Google, then “Advanced Search”. Type in “Comcast”, and filter to the last 24 hours. Not only will you get blogs, but you will also get twitters, plurks and a host of other items.

Now  if you organize that with specific keywords like “Comcast” and maybe a hot word like “sucks”, you can see all the blogs and posts that follow. If someone wrote an API that could constantly search for these words, then they can report on a system and get back to the author.

Of course, if you are on Comcast’s’ network and sending plain text (like most blogs are), then it’s ten times easier for Comcast to filter and respond. If it was encrypted, that would be a different story. However it’s only plain old text passing through the internet for all to read - including Comcast.

What is the good? Well, you may not want them to watch what you are sending, but if you put it out on Twitter or in a blog, you want people to see it anyway. So why not Comcast? Why not AT&T? Why not Steve Ballmer or Steve Jobs? I suppose if Ballmer or Jobs were to call you tomorrow over a blog or Twitter, you might see that as an honor that they are noticing your posts.

It can also alert people of any questionable activity. In this post 9-11 era, concern over communication is a hot issue. With so many ways to communicate over the internet, it might be nice to stop another epic event before it takes place.

What is the Bad? Well, it’s just another form of Big brother watching. One more step closer for RIAAs and MPAAs to surface. It is wrong to duplicate and distribute copyrighted material, but for those who don’t do that it’s not fair if we are being watched.

Dave Winer reported that right before an Obama speech, he was disconnected from Comcast for “Security” issues. Dave instantly closed his Comcast account. If I was in the same position, I think I would have either done the same thing or strongly worded the incident and made sure enough people heard it. I would most likely do the latter if I didn’t have another avenue of connection.

Is there a “Happy Medium”? Not really. That is why history is riddled with events like witch hunts and the Spanish Inquisition (Yeah, I know. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition). But with pressure to have a safe lifestyle, you have to have someone watching over it, right?

Well, someone or something might be watching you now. Whether it’s the ISP seeing what you are posting on your Blog or twitter, a security camera watching your actions in and out of a retail store, an ATM watching you take your money or one person just peering out the window to see what you’re up to. It’s all the same, right?

Some may call this move by Comcast as creepy. Others may call it brilliant because they are preventing issues. Even others may call it questionable practice because they are watching you. But the old saying “Danged if you do, danged if you don’t” can come into play here. We want to be safe but we don’t want to be watched or held accountable. What goes on behind closed doors….


no one deals like we do! Watch Big Brother 9 24/7 on SuperPass



YouTube Channel